Monday, November 30, 2015
Friday, November 27, 2015
Vladimir Putin Is Morally and Intellectually Destroying the New World Order
By Jonas E. Alexis on
October 23, 2015
If Edmund
Burke is right in saying that “It is ordained in the eternal constitution of
things, that men of intemperate minds cannot be free,” and that “Their passions
forge their fetters,” then Putin is doing a great job by introducing morality
and practical reason to the political world.
“Yes, I’m
in the process of bringing NWO agents down to their lowest point. I’ve already
exposed them for what they are really are: liars, thugs, gangsters, and blood
suckers. They can’t refute that at all, therefore they are calling me names. If
they continue to violate the moral law and order, then they won’t be too upset
if I put a little red pepper in their midst.”
Putin
continues to drop political explosives in the New World Order by saying that
its agents are liars, and NWO agents continue to be stunned largely because
Putin has rendered them virtually powerless, helpless, and hopeless.
The
political tectonic shift is already in place. Just pick up some recent
newspapers, most specifically the New York Times, and you will read
things like this:
“THE
Russian president, Vladimir V. Putin, continues to surprise. Russia’s military
intervention in Syria, followed by a face-to-face meeting in Moscow this week
with that country’s president, Bashar al-Assad, has startled the world.”[1]
The New York Times seems to be upset because
Putin is not allowing NWO agents to remove Assad from power. Assad, the Times
says, is “flying high” because of Putin.[2] NWO agents also seem to be upset because
Putin is getting much appreciation from former president Jimmy
Carter, who has labeled Israel an apartheid state.
It got
even more interesting. Back in 2014, the Washington Post came out with
an article by Jewish professor Daniel W. Drezner entitled, “Why Vladimir
Putin’s strategic genius scares the heck out of me.”[3] In that article, Drezner seemed to
resemble Gollum, the ambivalent creature from J. R.R. Tolkien’s The Lord of
the Rings.
Keep in
mind that Gollum loves and hates the ring of power at the same time, as he
“loves and hates himself.” Drezner’s article was partly titled “Putin’s
strategic genius,” but he argued throughout that Putin’s strategic genius was
actually a disaster. Drezner simply could not make a rational and coherent
point.
We expect
that kind of reasoning from Drezner because he is living in an irrational
system, which at its core is diabolical. He placed a cartoon in the article
which displays Putin pouring blood all over the floor, which obviously
represents Crimea. But the simple fact is that Drezner cannot seriously look at
himself in the mirror and see blood all over his hands and face. The cartoon
should actually represent what Drezner’s brethren have done all over the Middle
East.
It was
Drezner’s brethren, Jewish intellectuals and Neo-Bolsheviks, who ended up
pursuing the war in Iraq. Granted, Drezner has criticized
the war, but he could never name the real culprits who actually sent the
six-trillion dollar bill to the American people. In his 2007 article entitled
“The New World Order,” Drezner wrote:
“More
ambitiously, the Bush administration has tried to reshape international
organizations to make them more accommodating to rising powers. In some
instances, the changes have occurred almost as a matter of course.”[4]
But who
was pushing Bush, Drezner? Why couldn’t you just point your readers to simple
sources like the Jewish
Virtual Library, which has a list of those who were behind the Bush
administration? Why couldn’t you talk about people like Ben Bernanke and Larry
Summers, two of the most corrupt individuals who are largely responsible for
the economic chaos in the United States?
“’Helicopter
Ben’ Bernanke has printed a couple of trillion dollars, just waved a wand and
invented them, then used those funds to buy things like mortgages and t-bills.”[5]
Now, suppose you bought a car and after a few days
you realized that the car dealer actually deceived you. You found out that the
car needs to be placed in junkyard because it is useless. Wouldn’t you demand
an explanation? Wouldn’t you be angry? And would you ever go back to that
dealer and ask for help on how to buy another car? Wouldn’t that be really
stupid?
Get this: Ben Bernanke was just on the news about
two days ago and he was being asked about the economy! He said,
“The
domestic economy at least is pushing forward…and we have a very low
inflation rate, [which is] below the Fed’s two percent target. So, that would
be the argument for going ahead and getting ahead of the curve.”
Really? Does this man believe this nonsense? Why
didn’t he address the actual problem? Why didn’t he tell his listeners that the
Federal Reserve prints money out of thin air? Why didn’t he address the fact
that usury is what’s killing the economy? Why wasn’t he honest with his
listeners by saying that people like him always end up worshiping Mammon? Why couldn’t
he quote Karl Marx, who said that money is the god of the…?
People
like Drezner missed the fact that Putin has warned NWO agents
over and over that he would strip them from their decadent nests. Putin invited
NWO agents to discuss some of those issues on a purely moral and intellectual
level, but they refused.
Putin had
no other choice but to put the issues to Russian intellectuals and thinkers,
people who obviously understand what he is trying to say. “We have an open
discussion here,” Putin said in his recent address, and “this is an open
intellectual platform for an exchange of views, assessments and forecasts that
are very important for us here in Russia.”
The fact
that Putin summoned Leo Tolstoy’s War and Peace during his speech once
again suggests that he is right in line with the Western intellectual
tradition, which was largely based on reason and ultimate Logos. Putin argued
that peace cannot be achieved without appealing to moral rules and principles:
“The main thing
is to ensure that this competition develops within the framework of fixed
political, legal and moral norms and rules. Otherwise, competition and
conflicts of interest may lead to acute crises and dramatic outbursts.
“We have
seen this happen many times in the past. Today, unfortunately, we have again
come across similar situations. Attempts to promote a model of unilateral
domination, as I have said on numerous occasions, have led to an imbalance in
the system of international law and global regulation, which means there is a
threat, and political, economic or military competition may get out of
control.”
If an
agent seeks to violate the moral law and political order, argued Putin, then
that agent must face the consequences of his actions—in the same way that a
genuine police officer is punishing a law breaker or gangster or thug. NWO
agents in the United States and Israel have violated the moral and political
order, and this is one reason why Putin confronted that issue indirectly:
“The use
of the threat of a nuclear missile attack from Iran as an excuse, as we know,
has destroyed the fundamental basis of modern international security – the
Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty. The United States has unilaterally seceded from
the treaty. Incidentally, today we have resolved the Iranian issue and there is
no threat from Iran and never has been, just as we said.
“Recently
the United States conducted the first test of the anti-missile defence system
in Europe. What does this mean? It means we were right when we argued with our
American partners. They were simply trying yet again to mislead us and the
whole world. To put it plainly, they were lying. It was not about the
hypothetical Iranian threat, which never existed.
“It was
about an attempt to destroy the strategic balance, to change the balance of
forces in their favour not only to dominate, but to have the opportunity to
dictate their will to all: to their geopolitical competition and, I believe, to
their allies as well. This is a very dangerous scenario, harmful to all,
including, in my opinion, to the United States.”
Putin is
again showing the entire world that NWO agents have no clothes, and
they are now paying close attention to what he is saying. They are now
listening to every single word he has uttered. They are examining his speech
and comments with a political microscope and then responding in hundreds of
articles, many of which are pure mumbo jumbo.[6] Jim
W. Dean has recently said that
“Putin
continues to slay Western propaganda and leadership reputations almost every
time he gives a talk.”
True. He
continues to slay them not with rhetoric, but with what Emmanuel Kant would
have called practical reason. And the New York Times proves this point
when they say that Putin is “doubling down on bad decisions guided by an
outdated theory of international politics.”[7]
Outdated
theory? Fighting ISIS in Syria is outdated? Telling NWO agents that they
worship Satan is outdated? You see, Putin has every reason to say that the New
World Order is on the borderline of conspiracy:
“We also
see the development of the process to create non-transparent economic blocs,
which is done following practically all the rules of conspiracy. The goal is
obvious – to reformat the world economy in a way that would make it possible to
extract a greater profit from domination and the spread of economic, trade and
technological regulation standards.”
Speaking
to NWO agents in the United States on how they are largely responsible for the
Syrian refugee crisis, Putin unapologetically said:
“The
authorities in countries that seemed to have always appealed to such values as
freedom of speech and the free dissemination of information – something we have
heard about so often in the past – are now trying to prevent the spreading of
objective information and any opinion that differs from their own; they declare
it hostile propaganda that needs to be combatted, clearly using undemocratic
means.
“Unfortunately,
we hear the words war and conflict ever more frequently when talking about
relations between people of different cultures, religions and ethnicity.
“Today
hundreds of thousands of migrants are trying to integrate into a different
society without a profession and without any knowledge of the language,
traditions and culture of the countries they are moving to.
“Meanwhile,
the residents of those countries – and we should openly speak about this,
without trying to polish things up – the residents are irritated by the
dominance of strangers, rising crime rate, money spent on refugees from the
budgets of their countries.
“Many
people sympathise with the refugees, of course, and would like to help them.
The question is how to do it without infringing on the interests of the
residents of the countries where the refugees are moving.
“Meanwhile,
a massive uncontrolled shocking clash of different lifestyles can lead, and
already is leading to growing nationalism and intolerance, to the emergence of
a permanent conflict in society.”
The New
World Order has created ISIS. ISIS, as Putin put it, “is an enemy of
civilization” and is “trampling upon morals and world religious values,
including those of Islam, thereby compromising it.” Finally, Putin wounded NWO
agents when he asserted:
“It is
impossible to combat terrorism in general if some terrorists are used as a
battering ram to overthrow the regimes that are not to one’s liking. You cannot
get rid of those terrorists, it is only an illusion to think you can get rid of
them later, take power away from them or reach some agreement with them. The
situation in Libya is the best example here.”
So, Putin does not just posit an assertion and
leaves the political scene without evidence. He suggests that a case study is
simply Libya. What happened when NWO agents killed Gaddafi in cold blood?
Chaos, destruction, and suffering on a massive
scale. Why? Well, NWO agents have abandoned the light of reason and have
embraced complete madness. E. Michael Jones has recently argued that people
like Michel
Foucault have used madness to promote their own revolutionary (and
obviously Satanic) ideology.[8] NWO agents are doing the same thing in
Syria. Putin is saying that people of reason cannot tolerate that kind of
behavior any longer.
If Edmund Burke is right in saying that “It is
ordained in the eternal constitution of things, that men of intemperate minds
cannot be free” and that “Their passions forge their fetters,”[9] then Putin is doing a great job by
introducing morality and practical reason to the political world. It also means
that NWO agents who are slaughtering Palestinian civilians in Israel must be
removed from their decadent nests as well.
[1] Michael A. McFaaul, “The Myth of Putin’s Strategic Genius,” NY Times, October 23, 2015.
[2] Patrick Chappate, “Bashar al-Assad, Flying High,” NY Times, October 23, 2015.
[3] Daniel W. Drezner, “Why Vladimir Putin’s strategic genius scares the heck out of me,” Washington Post, July 30, 2014.
[4] Daniel W. Drezner, “The New World Order,” Foreign Affairs, March/April 2007.
[5] Matt Taibbi, “Rick Perry vs. Ben Bernanke: Round One,” Rolling Stone, August 11, 2011.
[6] See for example Noah Rothman, “The Anti-War Left Self-Destructs,” Commentary, October 16, 2015.
[7] Drezner, “Why Vladimir Putin’s strategic genius scares the heck out of me,” Washington Post, July 30, 2014.
[8] E. Michael Jones, “The Great Satan and Me: Reflections on Iran and Postmodernism’s Faustian Pact, Part II,” Culture Wars, October 2015.
[9] Quoted in E. Michael Jones, Libido Dominandi: Sexual Liberation and Political Control (South Bend: St. Augustine’s Press, 2000), 607.
Jonas E. Alexis graduated
from Avon Park High School, studied mathematics and philosophy as an
undergraduate at Palm Beach Atlantic University, and has a master's degree in
education from Grand Canyon University.
A Warning from Putin: Any Corrupt Russian
Oligarchs, all of whom have Stolen Major Russian Assets and became
Personally Wealthy, Return the Russian Money—or Pay the Consequences—DEAD
OR ALIVE!!!
George Soros Causing the Migrant Crisis
Viktor Orbán Slams George Soros AGAIN: Well-Funded Activists Are Causing
the Migrant Crisis
Firebrand Hungarian
Prime Minister Viktor Orbán has, for the second time during Europe’s
migrant crisis, lashed out at billionaire George Soros who he says is
responsible for the continent-wide epidemic.
Mr. Orbán
was interviewed on Hungarian radio this morning. He blamed the likes
of Mr. Soros – a massive funder of pro-migration groups across the
world – for attracting what he described as an invasion of migrants
to the continent, reports Der Spiegel.
He
said: “This invasion is driven, on the one hand, by people
smugglers, and on the other by those (human rights) activists who support
everything that weakens the nation-state.
“This
Western mindset and this activist network is perhaps best represented by George
Soros.”
Mr. Soros
uses his billions to promote his worldview in over 100 countries. He funds
a global network of foundations, initiatives, projects and partners
to promote his particular vision of an enlarged European Union and a world
with no borders.
As Breitbart
London previously reported, he believes groups funded by Mr.
Soros “are drawing a living from the immigration crisis”. His Open Society Foundations, which provide endless
streams of pro-migration talking heads for news outlets, are a case in
point.
The Open Society
Institute–Budapest (OSF) has helped activists working with migrants on
issues “affecting the safety and well-being of migrants, refugees, and asylum
seekers”. Despite the return to relative peace and stability seen in Hungary
following decisions taken by Mr. Orbán, it has repeatedly condemned
his government’s rhetoric and the sealing of borders to
migrants. The OSF website explains:
“We
believe that migration and asylum policy should be grounded in economic and
demographic realities, not driven by temporary political considerations or
popular misconceptions. In Europe, many of our civil society partners are
raising their voices demanding a common European approach in line with
international human rights commitments. We also support legal action aimed at
ensuring governments meet their obligations under international law to treat
all migrants with dignity, and offer them asylum when circumstances dictate.”
As far as
Mr. Orbán is concerned migration policy is in fact being driven by what he
calls America’s “naked national and imperial interests”. In the past he has
also identified financial self-interest as a motive of Western groups promoting
migration.
Obama is financially
backed by Soros as is Hillary. Black Lives Matter, Media Matters, and Move-On
are just a few of the many organizations that he funds to promote division and
chaos in the U.S.
Plus the NWO funding
of ISIS needs to be more widely know
Saturday, November 21, 2015
Freedom of Information Act 2000 - Getting Scrapped?
Freedom of Information Act 2000: The Prime Minister is drawing the blinds on
open government
I share the concerns of campaigners who fear the
Independent Commission examining the Act will recommend the
introduction of fees for FOI requests and rule that entire tranches of
information should be exempt and stay secret.
· Tom Watson Thursday
19 November 2015
Five years ago, David Cameron promised to lead the most transparent administration in history, declaring that “sunshine is the best disinfectant”. But now the Prime Minister is drawing the blinds on open government. The Tories want to water down the Freedom of Information Act 2000, one of the most effective pieces of legislation Parliament has ever passed. It has been used by campaigners, journalists and members of the public to uncover data breaches, discover how many criminals are on the run and reveal that our nuclear power stations are in a shocking state of disrepair. It should be extended and strengthened.
The Cabinet has appointed an Independent Commission to examine the Act, which was passed by a Labour government in 2000 and came into effect in 2005. A public consultation ends on Friday, but given that the Commission’s five members, who include ex-Ofcom chair Dame Patricia Hodgson and former Tory leader Michael Howard, have publicly criticised the FOI regime, its conclusions are a foregone conclusion. Campaigners fear the Commission will recommend the introduction of fees for FOI requests and rule that entire tranches of information, including government deliberations on policy decisions, should be exempted from the Act and stay secret. I share their concerns. That’s why I am announcing that Labour will conduct its own examination into FOI, with evidence sessions taking place in public next month. We want to hear from those who use the Act, and the organisations who are covered by it, about how it might be improved.
There are
limits to what should be revealed by government. No one believes information
that could threaten national security should be made publicly available. But
the Act has laid bare public waste, shed light on injustices and exposed
cover-ups. We have had a decade of sunshine. I used the Act to reveal
David Cameron spent thousands of pounds of public money on a new kitchen at his
Downing Street home at a time when tens of thousands of council house tenants
were told their own kitchens would not be upgraded because his Government
scrapped the scheme that would have paid for improvements.
Read more
- Limiting FoI requests just keeps the public in the dark
- Freedom of Information laws 'are misused by journalists'
- Why Freedom of Information requests may no longer be free
- Newspapers tell Government not to weaken Freedom of Information law
Perhaps
that’s why the Prime Minister doesn’t like the Act. There are many who regard
it as irritating and unhelpful. That is to be expected; being held to account
can often be an uncomfortable experience. But the public has a right to know how
their money is spent and discover how and why the decisions taken in their name
are made. They need the tools to do that. They need the Freedom of
Information Act.
The Act
works and it is relatively inexpensive. It costs around £10m a year for
Government departments to administer the FOI regime. Those costs would fall
dramatically if they placed more information in the public domain to start
with. Too many of them are doing precisely the opposite. Perversely, some local
councils use FOI as an excuse to place information that was previously
available behind a wall of secrecy the public has to clamber over - often by
using FOI requests that take time and effort to submit and money to process.
The Labour Party believes the Government’s Independent Commission should take
evidence on how the Act is subverted or misused. Its remit should be extended
so that it also considers whether the FOI regime has been a success and makes
recommendations on how it can be improved. Its terms of references don’t
currently allow it to do any of that.
There is
a strong argument in favour of extending and strengthening the Act so that it
covers organisations that are given public money, such as free schools, and
companies that win large government contracts. Accountability must not stop
where private sector involvement begins. Nor should we be fooled by Mr
Cameron’s attempt to convince us he presides over an open and transparent
government simply because he has encouraged Government departments to share
data. Publishing figures on the number of public sector employees who earn more
than the Prime Minister is not the same as acting to ensure the layers of
secrecy that once cloaked Westminster and Whitehall are permanently removed. As
the Prime Minister once argued, bad decisions are made in the darkest corners
of government when the light of public scrutiny can’t penetrate them. He should
let the sunshine in.
Tom
Watson is deputy leader of the Labour Party
·
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)