Friday, June 27, 2014
Thursday, June 12, 2014
Land Registry UK - To Be Privatised?
Land-Registry staff on 48-hour strike against privatisation plan
The Land is Ours |
14.05.2014
Today and tommorrow (14-15 May), a 48-hour strike by thousands
of workers at the Land Registry is taking place over plans to privatise
the 150-year-old agency, which is expected to lead to hundreds of job
cuts. Members of the Public and Commercial Services (PCS) union have
walked out in 14 locations across England and Wales. The Law Society,
high street solicitors, property search providers and the PCS were among
many to voice opposition to privatisation. PCS and others argue that it
will affect the quality and accuracy of service, the security of data
and force up the cost of the service to the public.
HM Land Registry has been a part of central government since its
creation in 1862, when it was formed to create security of title to
land as an impartial arm of the state (though the modern Land Registry
was re-established out of the Land Registration Act of 1925 and has only
recorded/registered property which has been subject to
market-transactions since that time. This means that land inherited
under title remains unrecorded in the Land Registry).
The Land-Registry makes quasi-judicial decisions on thousands of property transactions on a daily basis, granting title and recording and maintaining the register that contains details including house and land purchases, rights, remortgages and other secured debts.
As a “trading fund” it makes no call on the taxpayer, as it is entirely funded by transaction fees and — because it is so efficient — it is able to pay a sizeable dividend to the Treasury on an annual basis.
For 149 years it was part of the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) and predecessor departments. In 2013 machinery of government changes moved it to the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) under Secretary of State Vince Cable. Within BIS, the Land Registry is under the control of the shareholder executive, which also controls Ordnance Survey, the Met Office and Companies House.
Since the early 1970s the Land Registry has been subject to seven studies into possible privatisation. These studies, undertaken by both Conservative and Labour governments, have each unequivocally concluded that privatisation would be utterly wrong and against the public interest.
The most recent “feasibility study,” however, sought to answer the question “how would you privatise HM Land Registry?” and was carried out following the coalition government’s 2010 comprehensive spending review. The then parent department, MoJ, commissioned the management consultants and well-known privateers KPMG to carry out this study. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KPMG
The Land-Registry makes quasi-judicial decisions on thousands of property transactions on a daily basis, granting title and recording and maintaining the register that contains details including house and land purchases, rights, remortgages and other secured debts.
As a “trading fund” it makes no call on the taxpayer, as it is entirely funded by transaction fees and — because it is so efficient — it is able to pay a sizeable dividend to the Treasury on an annual basis.
For 149 years it was part of the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) and predecessor departments. In 2013 machinery of government changes moved it to the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) under Secretary of State Vince Cable. Within BIS, the Land Registry is under the control of the shareholder executive, which also controls Ordnance Survey, the Met Office and Companies House.
Since the early 1970s the Land Registry has been subject to seven studies into possible privatisation. These studies, undertaken by both Conservative and Labour governments, have each unequivocally concluded that privatisation would be utterly wrong and against the public interest.
The most recent “feasibility study,” however, sought to answer the question “how would you privatise HM Land Registry?” and was carried out following the coalition government’s 2010 comprehensive spending review. The then parent department, MoJ, commissioned the management consultants and well-known privateers KPMG to carry out this study. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KPMG
Earlier this
year, the Public Service Union's land registry group obtained a copy of
the "feasibility study" written by KPMG - one of the world's largest
audit companies - under a freedom of information request.
Coincidentally, several members of the shareholding executive which
currently run the Land Registry within the BIS come from KPMG, including
its chief Mark Russell..
The minister responsible is Michael Fallon, who was the main mover in government for the botched and ludicrous privatisation of Royal Mail. The PCS claim Fallon has made assurances that the status quo is an option, although this was not clearly stated in the consultation papers. The Law Society, high street solicitors, property search providers and the PCS were among the many voices who have voiced opposition to the notion of privatisation of the Land Registry.
The KPMG report, obtained by PCS under freedom of information,concluded that the best way to privatise the Land Registry would be to firstly vest it into a government-owned company, which — surprise surprise — was one of the options contained within the government consultation, which closed on March 20. The other consultation options included a joint-venture partnership and contracting out almost the entire delivery side of the Land Registry. Each of the options included the retention of a small office of the chief land registrar within government, to deal with statutory elements. This was an unsuccessful attempt to reassure the public and legal profession that state guarantee of title and service levels would be protected.
PCS and others argue that this would affect the quality and accuracy of service and the security of the data they collect and hold. They also argue that concurrent consideration on what Land Registry would look like, including under the government’s “digital by default” strategy, would inevitably force up the cost to the public and potentially put small high street conveyancing firms out of business.
The minister responsible is Michael Fallon, who was the main mover in government for the botched and ludicrous privatisation of Royal Mail. The PCS claim Fallon has made assurances that the status quo is an option, although this was not clearly stated in the consultation papers. The Law Society, high street solicitors, property search providers and the PCS were among the many voices who have voiced opposition to the notion of privatisation of the Land Registry.
The KPMG report, obtained by PCS under freedom of information,concluded that the best way to privatise the Land Registry would be to firstly vest it into a government-owned company, which — surprise surprise — was one of the options contained within the government consultation, which closed on March 20. The other consultation options included a joint-venture partnership and contracting out almost the entire delivery side of the Land Registry. Each of the options included the retention of a small office of the chief land registrar within government, to deal with statutory elements. This was an unsuccessful attempt to reassure the public and legal profession that state guarantee of title and service levels would be protected.
PCS and others argue that this would affect the quality and accuracy of service and the security of the data they collect and hold. They also argue that concurrent consideration on what Land Registry would look like, including under the government’s “digital by default” strategy, would inevitably force up the cost to the public and potentially put small high street conveyancing firms out of business.
Leaked documents show that in a Land Registry board
meeting in March, the board had detailed discussions about the pros and
cons of two types of privatisation under the heading “business
strategy”, appearing to discuss a KPMG presentation on the possibility
of a private sector partner. The meeting did not consider the option of
keeping the registry as a public asset.
Former executives from the body, that registers the ownership of land and property in England and Wales, say that a sell-off “beggars belief” because it will allow the private sector to adjudicate on what can be conflicting interests between sellers, buyers, lenders and neighbours.
KPMG - World's Best Outsourcing Advisors:
In 2011, KPMG was named as the World's Best Outsourcing Advisors, which basically recognizes their skills to help companies get rid of good paying staff positions and farming them out to lower-paying, often questionable companies. KPMG International Cooperative is a Swiss entity. It is the coordinating entity for a global network of independent firms in 146 countries employing 140,000 people. Each KPMG firm is separate and legally distinct. In 2005, KPMG in the United States admitted to criminal wrongdoing and agreed to pay $456 million in fines, restitution and penalties as part of an agreement to defer prosecution of the firm concerning a multi-billion-dollar criminal tax fraud conspiracy.
Alternative Vision for the UK Land Registry:
The PCS Alternative Vision for HM Land Registry makes the case that 'the land register — currently covering what they estimate is around 80 per cent of the land in England and Wales — must be completed to create a quasi Domesday Book for the 21st century'. As mentioned before, the modern Land Registry created out of the Land Registration Act of 1925 has only recorded/registered property which has been subject to market-transactions since that time. This means that land inherited under title remains unrecorded in the Land Registry.
Michael Kavanagh, president of the Public Service Union's land registry group: "This would allow for a proper public debate on land ownership and pave the way for regulation of the planning of land use in the future, something which the Land Registry could carry out for the public good."
(..TLIO would add, so that all land is covered; of course privatisation would make that even more unlikely and information requests no doubt more expensive).
Former executives from the body, that registers the ownership of land and property in England and Wales, say that a sell-off “beggars belief” because it will allow the private sector to adjudicate on what can be conflicting interests between sellers, buyers, lenders and neighbours.
KPMG - World's Best Outsourcing Advisors:
In 2011, KPMG was named as the World's Best Outsourcing Advisors, which basically recognizes their skills to help companies get rid of good paying staff positions and farming them out to lower-paying, often questionable companies. KPMG International Cooperative is a Swiss entity. It is the coordinating entity for a global network of independent firms in 146 countries employing 140,000 people. Each KPMG firm is separate and legally distinct. In 2005, KPMG in the United States admitted to criminal wrongdoing and agreed to pay $456 million in fines, restitution and penalties as part of an agreement to defer prosecution of the firm concerning a multi-billion-dollar criminal tax fraud conspiracy.
Alternative Vision for the UK Land Registry:
The PCS Alternative Vision for HM Land Registry makes the case that 'the land register — currently covering what they estimate is around 80 per cent of the land in England and Wales — must be completed to create a quasi Domesday Book for the 21st century'. As mentioned before, the modern Land Registry created out of the Land Registration Act of 1925 has only recorded/registered property which has been subject to market-transactions since that time. This means that land inherited under title remains unrecorded in the Land Registry.
Michael Kavanagh, president of the Public Service Union's land registry group: "This would allow for a proper public debate on land ownership and pave the way for regulation of the planning of land use in the future, something which the Land Registry could carry out for the public good."
(..TLIO would add, so that all land is covered; of course privatisation would make that even more unlikely and information requests no doubt more expensive).
The Land is Ours
Homepage: http://www.tlio.org.uk/Land-Registry-workers_48-hour_strike/
Homepage: http://www.tlio.org.uk/Land-Registry-workers_48-hour_strike/
Wednesday, June 11, 2014
"The Europe We Would Like To Inherit," refers to the EU as a country!
Atlantic Council "The Europe We Would Like To
Inherit"
by Muddassar Ahmed, Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed, Dustin Dehez,
Spela Kranjc, and Ivo Sobral
How very interesting!
This report actually refers to the EU as a country!
Sunday, June 8, 2014
Agenda 21, Your Life In Their (Communitarian) Hands.
Here is an interesting development.
A new, free e-book is now being promoted at the UK Column,
‘Agenda 21, Your Life in Their Hands’ by Martin Edwards.
I suppose he has tried his best! He has been assisted by a research team of 4 people.
What I find so astonishing about this
book is not what it actually contains but what it has left out. Quite miraculously, all of this is information
has been gathered, with reference to research, educational articles and
documentaries around subjects such as - sustainable development, the
transformation to global governance, ICLEI, smart growth, localism, leadership,
citizenship study programs, without any
reference to communitarianism, Henry Tam, Amitai Etzioni, or Niki Raapana and Nordica Friedrich and their vast body of Anti Communitarian studies plus their mind-blowing revelation
of how the Hegelian Dialectic tactic is being cynically used to achieve all
this ‘change.’
One good aspect is that Rosa Koire is not referred to
either!
The UK Column is also setting up an ‘Agenda 21 Research
Unit‘ and hopes to soon be producing bi-monthly briefings on this subject. Naturally, I await this development with great
interest.
Sigh!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)