UK Queen in depleted uranium trade.

Islamic Bogeywomen. Is it the season of the witch?

  Huda Salih Mahdi Ammash, nicknamed "Mrs Anthrax"

  Rihab Rashida Taha, nicknamed "Dr. Germ" 

 http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/12282005_germ_and_anthrax

Fishy - or what? Can you remember the stream of lurid headlines across the UK over these Iraqi scientists, one of whom had been a Biology? student in Norwich (and described as polite, hard-working and charming), who later worked for Saddam Hussein, in secret mobile labs hidden in the desert, developing a mixture of ebola virus with anthrax and smallpox to be delivered via airasole to wipe out entire populations of cities by terrorists based in Iraq? The reports on these scientists/bogeymen, along with Osama Bin Laden, were one of the reasons for the West's war against Iraq.  All nonsense and lies!

...from 5 June 2003 to 11 June 2003 when Kelly went to view and photograph two alleged mobile weapons laboratories as a part of a third inspection team.  Kelly was unhappy with the description of the trailers and spoke off the record to The Observer, which, on 15 June 2003, quoted "a British scientist and biological weapons expert, who has examined the trailers in Iraq." The expert said:

They are not mobile germ warfare laboratories. You could not use them for making biological weapons. They do not even look like them. They are exactly what the Iraqis said they were – facilities for the production of hydrogen gas to fill balloons.^[10]

It was confirmed in the Hutton Inquiry that Kelly was the source of this quote.^[11]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Kelly_%28weapons_expert%29

The current reports on ‘White Widow' Samantha Lewthwaite  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2432834/Kenya-attack-Sexy-lingerie-White-Widow-Samantha-Lewthwaites-house.html

very much remind me of this reporting, especially now her passport has been miraculously "found" at the scene of the Nairobi atrocities/crimes (memories of the passports found at the remains of the Twin Towers?)  These terrorists are just so careless with their passports, aren't they?

Jesus Has Taken The Kingdom From The Jews.

To Which Nation Has Jesus Given The Kingdom To?

New Testament references to the new chosen ones and God's rejection of Jerusalem the un-holy city, the Jews and their Temple.

The Parable of the Wicked Vinedressers, from Mathew chapter 21: 33 – 46, and the reaction to it by the Pharisees in the Temple at Jerusalem.   http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Matthew-Chapter-21/

²³ And when he (Jesus) was come into the temple, the chief priests and the elders of the people came unto him as he was teaching, and said, By what authority doest thou these things? and who gave thee this authority?

²⁴ And Jesus answered and said unto them, I also will ask you one thing, which if ye tell me, I in like wise will tell you by what authority I do these things.

²⁵ The baptism of John, whence was it? from heaven, or of men? And they reasoned with themselves, saying, If we shall say, From heaven; he will say unto us, Why did ye not then believe him?

²⁶ But if we shall say, Of men; we fear the people; for all hold John as a prophet.

²⁷ And they answered Jesus, and said, We cannot tell. And he said unto them, Neither tell I you by what authority I do these things.

²⁸ But what think ye? A certain man had two sons; and he came to the first, and said, Son, go work to day in my vineyard.

²⁹ He answered and said, I will not: but afterward he repented, and went.

³⁰ And he came to the second, and said likewise. And he answered and said, I go, sir: and went not.

³¹ Whether of them twain did the will of his father? They say unto him, The first. Jesus saith unto them, Verily I say unto you, That the publicans and the harlots go into the kingdom of God before you.

³² For John came unto you in the way of righteousness, and ye believed him not: but the publicans and the harlots believed him: and ye, when ye had seen it, repented not afterward, that ye might believe him.

³³ Hear another parable: There was a certain householder, which planted a vineyard, and hedged it round about, and digged a winepress in it, and built a tower, and let it out to husbandmen, and went into a far country:

³⁴ And when the time of the fruit drew near, he sent his servants to the husbandmen, that they might receive the fruits of it.

³⁵ And the husbandmen took his servants, and beat one, and killed another, and stoned another.

³⁶ Again, he sent other servants more than the first: and they did unto them likewise.

³⁷ But last of all he sent unto them his son, saying, They will reverence my son.

³⁸ But when the husbandmen saw the son, they said among themselves, This is the heir; come, let us kill him, and let us seize on his inheritance.

³⁹ And they caught him, and cast him out of the vineyard, and slew him.

⁴⁰ When the lord therefore of the vineyard cometh, what will he do unto those husbandmen?

⁴¹ They say unto him, He will miserably destroy those wicked men, and will let out his vineyard unto other husbandmen, which shall render him the fruits in their seasons.

⁴² Jesus saith unto them, Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord's doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes?

⁴³ Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you ,(Jews) and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof. (the nation of Christians)

⁴⁴ And whosoever shall fall on this stone shall be broken: but on whomsoever it shall fall, it will grind him to powder.

⁴⁵ And when the chief priests and Pharisees had heard his parables, they perceived that he spake of them.

⁴⁶ But when they (the Pharisees) sought to lay hands (attack) on him (Jesus), they (the Pharisees) feared the multitude, because they (the multitude) took him (Jesus) for a prophet.

To Which Nation Has Jesus Given The Kingdom To?

King James Version: Acts Chapter 7: 48-49 

⁴⁸ Howbeit the most High dwelleth not in temples made with hands; as saith the prophet,
⁴⁹ Heaven is my throne, and earth is my footstool: what house will ye build me? saith the Lord: or what is the place of my rest?

King James Version: Revelation Chapter 11: 7 - 8

7 And when they shall have finished their testimony, the beast that ascendeth out of the bottomless pit shall make war against them, and shall overcome them, and kill them.

8 And their dead bodies shall lie in the street of the great city (Jerusalem), which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified.

King James Version   Matthew 23:38-39

³⁸ Behold, your house (the Jewish Temple) is left unto you desolate.
³⁹ For I say unto you, Ye (Jews and other non-Christians who have rejected Christ) shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.

Six Million My Ass

Oh what a tangled web we weave
when we set out to deceive.

Hmmmm!

http://trutube.tv/video/1761/Six-MIllion-My-Ass

Sad but true,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8BRbM52gpc

 

How did the Red Cross spend $106 Million Dollars in Haiti

China embraces 'British Model'. "I don't believe it!"

Below, in italics, is an article about how the Chinese are suppose to be ditching Communism and Mao in favour of the British version of democracy - or some such nonsense.  Please read it and make up your own mind.  Here is my answer to the Chinese agents quoted in this article. In the famous words of Victor Meldrew, "I don't believe it!" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLNrLI3OBwg

As an article it is interesting but it's all whitewash, IMHO.
The Chinese are inhumane, their leadership consists of psychopathic personalities and they are out to exploit Africa, and everywhere else, hand in hand with the Rothshilds, who are also inhumane, inbred psychopaths, etc.  See the work of Thomas Sheridan:-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tro2U-cezqo

In contrast to this article, which tries to spread the idea that the Chinese are becoming more democratic and like the British, which is highly ironic since most people in Britain have totally failed to realise how China has been and continues to directly influence British politics, the reverse is actually really true.  We are rapidly becoming a hell of a lot more like the Chinese.  Which is NOT good!

Chinese scholars are vigorously promoting communitarian-ism (via the "community" movement) in the west through western universities.  THIS HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR YEARS.  If you perform a scholarly online search of "communitarian law" communitarian leadership" "communitarian policies" international communitarianism" etc. the number of papers praising communitarianism, explaining it (trying to!) and promoting it being submitted by Chinese and Singaporean scholars is amazingly high.

Here's more:-

Henry Tam (a very powerful figure in Whitehall) developed the community movement for Blair's Third Way and played a part in Obama's "change" campaign.

        Here, Tam speaks in Harvard, USA.  Use slider to go to  32.37 minutes  for a brief introduction of Henry Tam, and then hear him speak. 

It is utterly amazing, this Chinese man has completely altered British and U.S. politics and yet most British and American people have never heard of him!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2fyNGfPgZ9M 

Cameron's Big Society is a continuation of Blair's Third Way.  The Big Society was developed by Lord Nat Wei, another very empowered Chinese change agent, he didn't have much to do really as Tam had already done all the spade work for him.
Look how "they" make Wei prominent and promote him to a Lord, but keep Tam a little-known figure.
Very clever isn't it?

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/nat-wei-meet-mr-big-hes-in-charge-of-the-pms-social-revolution-1980490.html

The Third Way and The Big Society are exactly the same "community-loving, 3rd sector" thing, proof that there is no difference anymore between our political parties. What is going on?

SO WHAT IS COMMUNITARIANISM?  WHY IS IT SO DANGEROUS?

Communitarianism is the law of the EU, and the UN.   It is facilitating the infiltration of polical life in all countries around the world by dangerous change agents and, in Britain, European countries and America it is destroying the Publc Sector and replacing it with an unaccountable 3rd sector which is going to ROB US ALL OF OUR RIGHTS AND PROPERTY!

For more on Communitarianism look here, http://nord.twu.net/acl/research/agenda21.html
You will not believe you eyes but it is all true!

DO YOU REALLY BELIEVE THIS? :-

UK Telegraph,

‘China embraces 'British Model', ditching Mao for Edmund Burke.’

David Cameron might be reassured to know that China's Communist leadership is studying the long arc of British history with intense interest, even if Russia's Vladimir Putin deems our small island to be of no account.  By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard

4:30PM BST 08 Sep 2013

25 Comments

"We want to learn from the British model," said Daokui Li, a member China's upper chamber or `House of Lords' (CPPCC) and a professor at Beijing's Tsinghua University.

"Today's leaders in China are looking carefully at the British style of political change over the last 400 years, analysing the difference with France," he told me at the annual Ambrosetti gathering of world policy-makers at Villa d'Este on Lake Como.

"England went through incredible changes: a war against the US; wars against France; wars against Germany twice, the rise and decline of empire; and universal suffrage. Yet society remained stable through all this turmoil, with the same institutions and political structure. We think the reason is respect for tradition, yet willingness to make changes when needed."

"It is a contrast with France. We know from De Toqueville's study of the Ancient Regime that if you don't do reforms, you will end up with a revolution, and that is what will happen in China if we don't reform in time,"

Professor Li said the 18th Century Irish philosopher Edmund Burke is now all the rage in Chinese universities, studied for his critique of violent revolution, and esteemed as the prophet of stability through timely but controlled change. They are enamoured by his theories of inheritance, the "living contract" through the generations, the limits of liberty, and -- a harder sell -- his small battalions.

Hobbes too is sweeping China's intelligentsia, and so is Hannah Arendt, the philosopher of the twin totalitarian movements Left and Right.  It is a ferment of ideas.  Mao is out, even if the Communist Party is still coy about saying this too publicly.

"We went through the Revolution of 1911 when we overthrew the emperor, then the May 4th Revolution of 1919, then the Communist Revolution of 1949, and then the Cultural Revolution. We're looking back at our history, and we are tired of this."

"This is why Bo Xilai scares people. He was embracing Mao's practice of continuous revolution, and it brings back bad memories."

I was aware that Burke is making a much-deserved come-back in Britain, propelled by Jesse Norman's splendid book "Edmund Burke:The First Conservative". But China's enthusiasm for his work has more global "gearing", as traders say.

The Nobel peace laureate -- and dissident -- Liu Xiaobo is a Burkean, as were many of those who signed the 2008 human rights charter.

Needless to say, Burke has much in common with Confucius, the ancient Chinese philosopher of order, tradition, and harmony, now enjoying a revival in China as a post-Maoist source of authority. Jiang Qing cites Burke extensively in his classic work on the rise of a new Confucian political order published in 2008: "China: Democracy, or Confucianism?"

You will recognise the words and style if you have read Burke's masterful Reflections on the French Revolution, the book that unmasked the squalid character of the Paris Putsch, and shattered the illusions of Jacobin fellow-travellers across Europe.

''Circumstances (which with some gentlemen pass for nothing) give in reality to every political principle its distinguishing colour and discriminating effect. The circumstances are what render every civil and political scheme beneficial or noxious to mankind.’’

“To avoid, therefore, the evils of inconstancy and versatility, ten thousand worse than those of obstinacy and the blindest prejudice, we have consecrated the state, that no man should approach to look into its defects or corruptions but with due caution; that he should never dream of beginning its reformation by its subversion; that he should approach to the faults of the state as to the wounds of a father, with pious awe and trembling solicitude.

By this wise prejudice we are taught to look with horror on those children of their country who are prompt rashly to hack that aged parent in pieces and put him into the kettle of magicians, in hopes that by their poisonous weeds and wild incantations they may regenerate the paternal constitutions and renovate their father’s life.”

To hack that aged parent to pieces. How resonant that must seem to survivors of the Cultural Revolution.

Prof Li said the new team of President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Keqiang -- both singing from the same hymn sheet according to him, though not others -- will start reforming the one-child policy, the hukuo code of rural `serfdom', and much else, before the end of the year. The last team coasted complacently, he said, relying on post-Lehman stimulus to keep growth going as the old system festered.

Whether China can really pull it off in an orderly way after letting rip with the biggest credit bubble in modern market history is a very open question.

But let us wish them the best of British luck, and celebrate our new Special Relationship with China.

No actually, let's not!

 

The famous UK 2-fingered salute!  An insult, in Britain, which goes back a long way - about 800 years, to when the long bow was the main weapon of war.  When the French captured an British long bowman they would cut of one or two of their fingers, so they could no longer use their bow. So at the beginning of a battle, the bowman would all wave their two fingers to the French as a serious threat to show that they still had their bow fingers so watch out. Now? It has the same basic meaning which is 'keep on mate and I will attack you.', which also means "f** off  if you know what's good for you . You have made me angry now and I could be a threat to you."