HIGHLY DANGEROUS, TOXIC
WOMEN!
1) Now we in Britain have had
female vicars and now female bishop thrust upon us, we are getting (predictable) calls from these monstrosities to
refer to God as a woman in Anglican services. (I could say I told you so!)
Support is growing within the Church of England (allegedly, and if you believe
the Jew-owned Zionist British press!) to rewrite
its official liturgy to refer to God as female following the selection of the
first women bishops.
Growing numbers of priests (really?) already insert words
such as “she” and “mother” informally into traditional service texts as part of
a move to make the language of worship more inclusive, it has been claimed. (how bloody annoying and
irritating must that be?)
But calls for a full overhaul of liturgy to
recognise the equal status of women have already been discussed informally at a senior level. (so most ordinary people don’t
necessarily want this, it’s just these arrogant, ambitious, unholy creeps)
It comes
after the “Transformations Steering
Group”, (set up by Archbishop Rowan Williams who was a
Druid!) a body which meets in Lambeth Palace to examine the impact of women in
ministry on the Church of England, issued a public call to the bishops to
encourage more “expansive language and imagery about God”. (I think God
should be referred to as a banana or perhaps a tree!)
The Rev Emma Percy, chaplain of Trinity College, Oxford, said the current exclusive use of “he” might make women feel less Christian. “When we use only male language for God we reinforce the idea that God is like a man and, in doing so, suggest that men are therefore more like God than women,” she told The Sunday Times. (Bullshit, most intelligent Christian women do NOT think this!)
The matter has been discussed within the transformation steering group,(the WHAT?) a body that meets in Lambeth
Palace to “explore the lived experience of women in ordained ministry”. The
group has issued a public call to bishops to encourage more “expansive language
and imagery about God”.
The
Rev Emma Percy, chaplain of Trinity College Oxford and a member of Watch,(not Witch then, eh?) said the effect of using both
male and female language would be to get rid of “the notion that God is some
kind of old man in the sky”.
What these women in the female
clergy of the Church of England are discussing is the Shechinah. What is the Shechinah?
The Shechinah is NOT
A CHRISTIAN TERM OR BELIEF. The
Shechinah is the Jewish feminine
side of God, even though it is not
mentioned once in the Torah/Old Testament of the Bible. It is actually a NEW-AGEY concept (similar in
many ways to Hinduism) introduced into Judaism in more recent years through the
Talmud.
The simple fact of
the matter is this; God is neither male nor female, or looked at another way, God
is both! God does not need to procreate sexually. However, Jesus did actually refer to his Holy Father! Full stop!
It would be polite
and respectful if women in the clergy had the common decency to stick to what
Jesus teaches us.
The driving force behind the women in the clergy movement in
the UK has been Hilary Cotton, a Common Purpose –type leadership consultant (surprise!) https://womenandthechurch.org/chairs-blog/from-the-chair-of-watch-hilary-cotton-women-able-to-be-bishops-tick-what-next/
The concept certainly of a feminine God has no place whatsoever in Christianity and, if you watch the last 5 minutes of this film from 58 minutes in, you will hear these two knowledgeable pastors ponder on the the Shechina and the Christian Church being infiltrated by Crypto Jews in order to destroy it from within. In her best-selling book, ‘The Hidden Dangers of the Rainbow,’ Constance Cumbey exposes the New Age movement in Christianity as pure witchcraft and Satanism. This is an author and book I have mentioned frequently before as it is an eye-opener, she also gives a very good talk on the subject online! :- www.youtube.com/watch?v=TmzN3f4mfjY
Are you aware that, as well as a one world government, police force,
monetary system and economy ‘they,' -the Chosen Elite, are also corrupting the world’s religions
aiming to eventually have a one world religion. This will not be achieved
through conquest but by fiddling around from within, undermining, altering,
nudging, NLP, etc. Here is a perfect
example of one issue…..
Resist modern
paganism, for we are facing the immanent paganization of our culture.
2) How Britain's 'most dangerous women' just derailed the repeal of the
Human Rights Act
The two women at the eye
of this political storm are
Result:- The Queen's
Speech 2015: The government has announced that it's no longer rushing to scrap
the Human Rights Act and
implement a British Bill of Rights. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_of_Rights_1689
Why will the repeal of the Human Rights Act mean it has to be automatically
replaced with some form of new British Bill of Rights? Why can’t Britain just go back to the way it
was before under our traditional and well-established English Bill of Rights
that already exists? It worked perfectly well and does not need replacing, what is really going on?
Here is a
perfect example of the
Hegelian Dialectic at work – right under our stupid noses and,
unless we start to understand how this works, we have literally had it as a free nation! Using the Hegelian Dialectic, the outcome is worked out beforehand, the goal – here it is to get rid of
the old Constitution and Bill of Rights, then they create something most
people won’t want (Human Rights Act) and will reject, so that the compromise
reached by getting rid of new creation involves damaging the old but it all seems
so reasonable – BUT IS THE
OUTCOME THEY WANTED ALL ALONG!
Do these two turkeys, above, fully understand the far-reaching implications of what they are being directed to do by the advisors from the stink tanks they have placed their trust in? Do they understand how the Hegelian Dialectic moulds their behaviour and opinions? It is highly likely that they do not.
Do you? You really should.
This article is courtesy of co-authors Niki Raapana and her daughter Nordica Friedrich:-
What is the Hegelian Dialectic?
No comments:
Post a Comment