Naomi Klein/Naomi Wolf - what's wrong with them?

What's Wrong with. . .Naomi Klein/Naomi Wolf?

By Miles Mathis,  first published November 26, 2013

This is a question I get a lot, especially from female readers.  It is a variation of a question I get from many readers male and female who are looking to keep one or two of their old heroes/heroines.  In short, they want to know if anyone will be left standing after I finish outing everyone. The short answer to that is NO, there won't be anyone famous left.  No one who you see on TV or read about in magazines or see at TED talks or see in major films will be left.  None of the big dogs of the alternative media will be left, either. And almost no one you have come across on Youtube will be left.  They are all plants.  A few of the old guys may survive, like Thoreau or, say, Joan of Arc.  And a few of the marginal characters on the internet may survive, especially if they aren't being promoted by any major sources of funding.  But the media being what it is, you can now just assume that anyone with a major publisher, a major award, a major grant, or any connection to either a political party or the government is a mole.  If they were telling the truth or leading you in the right direction, they wouldn't have any of those things.

After all that, I know many won't be satisfied. They will say something like, “You agree with Naomi Klein on almost everything. So how can you say she is a mole? Is it just because she is Jewish?” No, it isn't because she is Jewish.  It is because her articles are published by places like The Nation and Harpers, which are fronts for the faux-left (false left).  I have caught all these fake leftist magazines pushing propaganda over and over, so even when they publish something I agree with, I know they must be spinning me with it. That is what they do. That is why they exist.

Even worse is her position as Miliband Fellow at the London School of Economics. The LSE was founded by Fabians, including George Bernard Shaw, Sidney Webb, Beatrice Webb, and Annie Besant.  Remember, Besant led the Theosophy movement at the time, which I have shown was an Intel creation.  Beyond that, these people were involved in the rise of the misnamed Labour Party, which—like its counterparts in the US—claimed to be pro-Labor while being a cloaked tool of the Industrialists.  In other words, it was secretly anti-labor.  Just as the Marxists and Socialists (including Marx himself) were actually fronts for the Industrialists, so was the Labour Party.  What has the Labour Party ever done for unions or for the middle class?  It has run the UK on and off over the past fifty years (see Harold Wilson, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown), and the middle class has been eviscerated just as cleverly during those runs as during any conservative runs………

http://mileswmathis.com/naomi.pdf